/jp/ - 2D/Random

Anyone want to just suck my dick? I'm ready to get it over with.

ill suck yours if you suck mine first

>>573284 What are these two photos? What's the dealio?

>>573333
Why did you format your reply like that? When you click on someone's post number, it automatically adds a newline. There isn't any need to delete it, and it seems strange to do so. What's the dealio?

>>573333
im going to assrape you to death for not knowing the pic on the left kid now spread em

would've been better if elon was on the right as well
these new age memes just aren't cutting it

>>573333
i have seen the picture on the right posted quite a few times i believe it is a group of transgendered women (i cannot 100% confirm this) who look strange or otherwise unattractive

as for the image on the left im afraid that i am no more aware of the origins or meaning than you are

>>573372
it's a group of ota posters

>>573334 Do you have Asperger Syndrome or something?

>>573382
I don't see how that answers the question, which you seem to be avoiding.

>>573385 It's the same as I've always done it for 15 years, because I'm addressing the poster in the same sentence, I delete the new line without thinking about it. I don't care how you like to do it or if you think it's odd, that's you. It really doesn't matter, so please stop annoying everyone with stupid questions.

>>573387
Next, can you answer my question about the filenames?

>>573387
Hello?

>>573388 Damn you're desperate aren't you? Suck my asshole, I told you already weeks ago

>>573395
No, you didn't. You have by now, a few times, told me that you've told me. I don't really understand who you're trying to fool with this gambit. If you want to trick me into thinking you've told me when you haven't, you'll have to find some way past the method I have for checking if you've told me it not, which is to think on if I know the answer to my question. Since I don't know the answer, you must not have told me, or if you did then it was in some obscured manner (which, as they say, "doesn't count").

he didn't even say thankyou, what an asshole

I'll send my thanks once he answers my initial and primary question.

>>573402 I did…

>>573403
Just ran this by my check (see >>573396). Nope, doesn't look like you did.

if god was real he would turn me into a girl right now

>>573406
Why would he do that if he were real?

>>573407
uh to prove that he exists

uh but god isnt real

>>573409
Yeah bro, the universe and time just came from nothing, and then life came from inorganic matter, and then it turned into all life on Earth through random genetic mutation despite there being no known process in which genetic mutation can add new genetic information.

The proof of this? Absolutely nothing. It's not repeatable, observable, or verifiable.

Science…

>>573668
it's called evolution

>>573671
Yes and it's not repeatable, observable, or verifiable.

It's also full of holes, like irreducible complexity. How could sexual reproduction form through random genetic mutation of asexually reproducing organisms? The chance of being born with male or female sexual reproduction systems is already 0 (no known mechanism in which mutation can add new information), but let's say it hypothetically did happen, a compatible male/female reproductive system would also have to randomly form at the same time. Even if they did, sexual reproduction is literally 50% less efficient, there is benefits but they're far more irrelevant in terms of short-term selection than a flat 50% decrease in fertility and whatever extreme amount of "bugs" this newly formed method of reproduction would incur.

The origin of sexual reproduction is yet another thing not known by "science", because it's literally impossible in a naturalistic worldview.

If you actually understand the alleged biological process behind evolution, random genetic mutation at birth, you'd realize it's completely asinine and one of the biggest lies currently believed.

Natural selection is real, short term minor adaptations are real (all deleterious or modifications of DNA), the lie is that with no proof whatsoever, they stretch this into, if just given enough time, it would result in one animal turning into a different kind of animal.

Why is such nonsense so widely believed? Consensus among perceived authorities. Repeat the lie, punish anyone who questions it, and keep repeating the lie. The dumb people just agree without questioning, the smart people don't speak up because they'll be punished.

based biblemin owning the libs

a life without sex what a horrible fate

sageyragey

>>573677
>Yes and it's not repeatable, observable, or verifiable.
As opposed to a magical skydaddy I am an incomparable homo?

should i join the trilateral commission

pussy ass nigga

We will not allow a country where people must live in fear of buddies.