[ om / jp / 2d ] [ home ]

/ghost/ - The Graveyard

Name
Email
Subject
Comment
File
Password (For file deletion.)

File: 1495839251757.jpg (80.93 KB, 697x521, somk5mlhpuzy.jpg)

No. 12108

alright boys, how are we going to divvy them up

No.12109

File: 1495840874121.jpg (99.07 KB, 752x720, [HorribleSubs] Gabriel Dro….jpg)

I suppose my local zoo could use another monkey……

No.12110

I call dibs on any with school uniforms

No.12111

It's almost like they're not human, and just sexual objects.

Feminism is correct here, a broken clock is still right twice a day.

No.12112

Kill yourself retard.

No.12113

>>12111
Ahh….. Women aren't human though…

No.12114

>>12111
I agree. Pornography should either not exist, or it should actually treat the actors as human. It shouldn't just be about their bodies, but their personalities, skills, accomplishments, etc.

No.12115

pornography is dehumanizing and i feel myself less willing to fap the more of it im exposed to

No.12116

>>12115
You have to earn the right to be treated human

No.12117

aren't jap school uniforms a little too revealing

No.12118

File: 1495848710502.png (645.69 KB, 1050x1050, 24q7mk1ooecx.png)

Before civilization has been created, the strongest men would fuck most women and reproduce this way. Women had no say, whatsoever, about reproduction. They'd mostly get raped all the time. Currently, almost all men are stronger than almost all women. It's an evolutionary result of the said rape reproduction strategy. Actually, most mammals in one way or another, rape all the time. But because they haven't exactly got things such as empathy or self-awareness, they don't care. With time humans evolved things such as compassion and slowly it faded into the night. Even today, rape is the #1 fantasy women have, and if you're not a kissless virgin loser who reads tumblr, you will know that women don't find kindness sexually attractive. They love, when you start strangling them a little and be aggressive. Asking a woman for consent turns them off. It's a fact of science.

Civilizational progress has created marriage and monogamy to distribute the women fairly, so you don't have 1 male hogging a bunch of females. Thanks to this, we have achieved everything you can read in the history books. Even Freud argued that civilizational progress is the result of sexual repression. That's why religions are important, if you can, enumerate a single civilization that has been successful for any meaningful amount of time without religion. Literally none. Even “promiscuous” ancient Greeks had strong rules regarding marriage. When society in the Western Roman Empire cared less and less about the family unit, it eventually led to their collapse. It's not widely spoken about, but Roman empire at the end of its lifetime had pretty strong feminist values. Few letters and written evidence remain, but you can read about men complaining about this.

No.12119

File: 1495848810229.jpg (960.74 KB, 2000x1485, soviet - st06.jpg)

>>12118
We should redistribute women among all the men.
All women singing Katusya in unison!
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=O7PKpR6D4Aw

No.12120

File: 1495848886316.jpg (118.84 KB, 720x959, dbbd5d5e464d285b0410ec54d3….jpg)

Banzai Praise Stalin!

No.12121

I hate when ugly people complain about porn causing unrealistic expectations - it's their fault for being ugly.

No.12122

wow it's pretty mindblowing to think that the modern woman was shaped through evolution by hundreds of generations of rape thank you for opening my eyes to this fact i will never forget it

No.12123

>>12122
Men get their genes from women too though

Makes you think

No.12124

>>12123
all the good stuff is in the y chrom

No.12125

>>12124
You think there's any way to remove the Y chromosome and just add another X?

No.12126

>>12125
yeah be a girl

No.12127

Those girls may look nice in that picture but really they're just JERKS pretending to be cute for the money..

No.12128

>>12122
>>12123
Y Chromosome is inherited from man to man unchanged. It can only change by virtue of random mutation. You and your father certainly have the same Y chromosome. It's very likely if your father is a wimp faggot, that you are too. Same applies to mtDNA.

No.12129

>>12118
Men are not bigger than women for that reason, it's because the male is supposed to protect the others and they must fight among themselves so it pays to be bigger.

Women do not fantasize about rape per say, the girls that fantasize about such are thinking of an attractive man who they would voluntarily do things with any way, thus it is not rape.

The roman empire did not collapse for that reason.

No.12130

>>12129
Nice proofs there, nu-male. Keep believing in your little politically correct fantasy. Pathetic.

No.12131

>>12129
>Men are not bigger than women for that reason, it's because the male is supposed to protect the others and they must fight among themselves so it pays to be bigger.
If that is the case, why are women strong as well? Wouldn't it be tremendously more evolutionary advantageous to be able to protect your own damn children? You're fucking stupid.

>Women do not fantasize about rape per say, the girls that fantasize about such are thinking of an attractive man who they would voluntarily do things with any way, thus it is not rape.

Why, yes, of course. They fantasize about 2 metre viking, handsome giants raping them. I never said it isn't so.

>The roman empire did not collapse for that reason.

I am an incomparable homo, that's some very elaborative argument. Yes it did, it's one of the reasons, not the sole reason.

No.12132

>>12131
HE TRIPS ON THE WORDFILTERS!
WILL HE RECOVER FROM THIS BRUTAL MISTAKE!

No.12133

>>12129
>Men are not bigger than women for that reason, it's because the male is supposed to protect the others and they must fight among themselves so it pays to be bigger.

that doesn't make sense. a bigger female would be able to protect her children better so why aren't they bigger.

No.12134

>>12133
AN AMAZING REBUTAL. HE TURNED THE ARGUMENT ON IT'S HEALS

No.12135

nice arguments going on here otabros

No.12136

>>12134
>IT'S
you're not going to recover from that…

No.12137

>>12131
>>12133
Because it would take more food to grow and sustain, they would all starve. If it's just the male protecting the group then it is a much smaller amount of food that would be needed.Having said this there are of course some animals that do either have females and males of similar size or have a larger female, these are different species that such things can actually work with though.

Well it isn't rape then is it?

It's not even a reason at all really, certainly never one that has been mentioned by anyone but ignorant and bitter losers. The main reasons were economic decline and their neighbors becoming stronger and more able to fight them, they had trouble with the Germans when they were disorganized tribes with barely any metal causing them to have virtually no armour and basic spears. When they developed to a similar level as the Romans they were able to best them in many cases.

No.12138

This guy is actually completely wrong because women have always had plenty of say in reproduction and that's exactly how they manage to always ruin everything.

No.12139

>>12137
Adding to the first point, women are less effective at defending the group in the first place in many species like ours. They are developed to birth and raise children so their bodies are both less effective, have nutrients diverted to other functions in the first place and if they are pregnant they are going to need something protection them anyway.

No.12140

>>12137
i don't buy it.

the rape version just makes too much sense and has a very clear connection to evolutionary fitness: weak women are raped more often by strong males and therefore have more children, and the daughters are weak themselves and so on.

saying the female's smaller frame comes from nutrition doesn't really make sense, as humans and other animals can limit their growth in response to food scarcity. it would increase fitness to have women be bigger and then just not grow to full size if there isn't enough food, but obviously that's not the case as women today have adequate nutrition but are still smaller than males.

No.12141

File: 1495852441901.jpg (2.28 MB, 4160x2340, IMG_20170526_150430.jpg)

Women are fucking lame just like Japan

No.12142

>>12141
Japan is sacred and infallible

No.12143

>>12141
i see you found some of your own kind

No.12144

making me want to rape some girls…
i'm probably weaker than most girls though

No.12145

File: 1495852888489.gif (980.22 KB, 500x207, 5ec302db9683e1ef35d94d3602….gif)

>>12144
Girls are cute

No.12146

>>12140
Well in the first place it is not rape as such anyway, if you have ever had much to do with raising animals you would see that the female generally does not care in most cases, even if the male is smaller than they are. It's not as if they have any dignity or anything.

They can limit their growth, which is what they are doing by limiting the size of the female who is less effective at fighting and has other tasks and giving the male the responsibility of protection. We have only been able to eat as much as we want for such a small amount of time that it would not impact the millions of years of evolution before it.

No.12147

File: 1495853243438.png (514.85 KB, 551x713, 1489525425001.png)

>>12137
>ignorant and bitter losers
And that's how we all know you have no idea what you are talking about, you have no idea about biology nor evolution

You just care to “prove those misogynistic losers wrong”. You're officially cognitively deficient. You will do any mental gymnastics to prove something that isn't even based on reality, but fantasies of some people who think they will get laid if they are feminist enough. Spare yourself the trouble and re-consider your existence and beliefs. After all, it doesn't seem to be working.

No.12148

>>12147
it might be ota's sole female user

No.12149

we must respect women

No.12150

>>12147
Ahh, a Gabriel poster, this explains everything.

What I am saying has no bearing to any kind of agenda and certainly not an agenda I do not support in the first place, the same of course cannot be said of you.

No.12151

Did you know you have twice the female ancestors as male ones?

No.12152

>>12150
butthurt

No.12153

>>12151
How does that even work?

No.12154

File: 1495853850906.jpg (270.43 KB, 768x1024, fg_kiina010.jpg)


No.12155

>>12153
Maybe you should have Gaia explain it to you like you're 5?

No.12156

>>12139
>women are less effective at defending the group in the first place in many species like ours.
Exactly. Because they are evolved to be weaker.
>They are developed to birth and raise children so their bodies are both less effective, have nutrients diverted to other functions in the first place and if they are pregnant they are going to need something protection them anyway.
Claiming that ability to produce offspring = weaker body doesn't make any fucking sense WHATSOEVER. As a matter of fact, women who have more muscle to them/bigger frames are more likely to give a birth to a healthy child. I am pretty sure it's scientifically verifiable. We cannot say either way, nor me nor you have scientific evidence to point towards bigger frame vs. more nutrients to a child theory.

>>12146
>They can limit their growth, which is what they are doing by limiting the size of the female who is less effective at fighting and has other tasks and giving the male the responsibility of protection. We have only been able to eat as much as we want for such a small amount of time that it would not impact the millions of years of evolution before it.

That's just yet another one of your interpretations, just like the previous thing. Fact of science is: a bigger man can rape a weaker woman, and it happened. It'd be tremendously more evolutionary advantageous for an individual to rape as many females as possible and hog as many of them as you can. It's a scientific fact that before civilization that happened. You can look it up in scientific, peer-reviewed journals. I don't even know what you argue anymore. Regardless of whether it's a side-effect of nutrition a female needed to bring up a child or not it doesn't matter.

You didn't disprove the original theory.

No.12157

File: 1495854088607.jpg (2.7 MB, 4160x2340, IMG_20170527_101157.jpg)

Kill women

No.12158

All these arguments and not a single citation from either side…

No.12159

>>12155
How do you have twice the amount of female ancestors when you need a man and a woman to make a child?

No.12160

File: 1495854388787.jpg (176.94 KB, 640x960, 047.jpg)

Reminder nobody ever got anything, or changed an opposing party's mind in any internet argument ever.

No.12161

File: 1495854424357.jpg (382.42 KB, 1202x800, 97d4611b9893b0daa1339015fa….jpg)

>>12157
Don't

No.12162

>>12160
harry is right

No.12163

>>12159
Wow, that's a really hard one. Want to ask Gaia so they can explain it to you like you're 5?

No.12164

File: 1495854613517.gif (86.51 KB, 351x398, laugh.gif)

>>12163
You tripped on another filter I am not an incomparable homo.

No.12165

>>12156
It does produce a weaker body as the body is developed to suite other purposes. A woman with a high muscle content would not birth healthier children, women are covered in layers of fat needed to create children and it would not matter if she died because she was the strongest woman in the world but was eight months pregnant and could not defend her self in the first place.

Actually pretty much all people in the relevant fields support what I say, there was a really good one I saw somewhere but I can't find it again.

No.12166

>>12160
that's no reason not to have them

No.12167

>>12164
You just tripped a filter on purpose and you're assuming other people can't do the same. Have you figured it out yet, or do you want to go to Gaia?

No.12168

arguments are too confusing

No.12169

>>12167
ano…. no he didn't…

No.12170

>>12167
Except he didn't?

No.12171

Yeah, I would rather fail to notice the not than I would fail to comprehend how that could be true. Now that we accept that we have double the female ancestors as male ones, can we acknowledge how human society is set up to disregard loser males, while women get a free pass?

No.12172

>>12170
Reread the replacement you incomparable homo

No.12173

>>12171
Says the tard that failed to comprehend that the person making fun of him might be a different person than the tard who couldn't understand.

No.12174

>>12173
There were two people who didn't comprehend so I doubt it.

No.12175

File: 1495855966711.jpg (135.7 KB, 960x1280, 5a71bf21e14221fb639ab333d6….jpg)


No.12176

Why won't girls let me have sex with them why did I have to be born a nice guy

No.12177

Why do girls get to be born with value?

No.12178

>>12177
Just become trans, homo

No.12179

They're born with value because of their wombs… you don't get that by cutting off your dick and roleplaying…

No.55901

phew ill take the middle one

No.55978

>>12114
That would be pornography for women. It exists and it's called the erotic novel.

Hating pornography that focuses on appearance is sexist towards men because that's how male sexuality works.

No.56311

die latereply

No.56331

had a glance and lol'd



Delete Post [ ]
[Return]
[ om / jp / 2d ] [ home ]